§ 400.21 Procedure for determining whether defendant is a second felony
offender.
1. Applicability. The provisions of this section govern the
procedure that must be followed in any case where it appears that a
defendant who stands convicted of a felony has previously been convicted
of a predicate felony and may be a second felony offender as defined in
section 70.06 of the penal law.
2. Statement to be filed. When information available to the court
or to the people prior to sentencing for a felony indicates that the
defendant may have previously been subjected to a predicate felony
conviction, a statement must be filed by the prosecutor before sentence
is imposed setting forth the date and place of each alleged predicate
felony conviction. Where the provisions of subparagraph (v) of
paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section 70.06 of the penal law
apply, such statement also shall set forth the date of commencement and
the date of termination as well as the place of imprisonment for each
period of incarceration to be used for tolling of the ten year
limitation set forth in subparagraph (iv) of paragraph (b) of such
subdivision.
3. Preliminary examination. The defendant must be given a copy of
such statement and the court must ask him whether he wishes to
controvert any allegation made therein. If the defendant wishes to
controvert any allegation in the statement, he must specify the
particular allegation or allegations he wishes to controvert.
Uncontroverted allegations in the statement shall be deemed to have been
admitted by the defendant.
4. Cases where further hearing is not required. Where the
uncontroverted allegations in the statement are sufficient to support a
finding that the defendant has been subjected to a predicate felony
conviction the court must enter such finding and when imposing sentence
must sentence the defendant in accordance with the provisions of section
70.06 of the penal law.
5. Cases where further hearing is required. Where the defendant
controverts an allegation in the statement and the uncontroverted
allegations in such statement are not sufficient to support a finding
that the defendant has been subjected to a predicate felony conviction
the court must proceed to hold a hearing.
6. Time for hearing. In any case where a copy of the statement was
not received by the defendant at least two days prior to the preliminary
examination, the court must upon request of the defendant grant an
adjournment of at least two days before proceeding with the hearing.
7. Manner of conducting hearing.
(a) A hearing pursuant to this section must be before the court
without jury. The burden of proof is upon the people and a finding that
the defendant has been subjected to a predicate felony conviction must
be based upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt by evidence admissible
under the rules applicable to a trial of the issue of guilt.
(b) A previous conviction in this or any other jurisdiction which
was obtained in violation of the rights of the defendant under the
applicable provisions of the constitution of the United States must not
be counted in determining whether the defendant has been subjected to a
predicate felony conviction. The defendant may, at any time during the
course of the hearing hereunder controvert an allegation with respect to
such conviction in the statement on the grounds that the conviction was
unconstitutionally obtained. Failure to challenge the previous
conviction in the manner provided herein constitutes a waiver on the
part of the defendant of any allegation of unconstitutionality unless
good cause be shown for such failure to make timely challenge.
(c) At the conclusion of the hearing the court must make a finding
as to whether or not the defendant has been subjected to a predicate
felony conviction.
8. Subsequent use of predicate felony conviction finding. Where a
finding has been entered pursuant to this section, such finding shall be
binding upon that defendant in any future proceeding in which the issue
may arise.
.