§ 400.19 Procedure for determining whether defendant is a second child
sexual assault felony offender.
1. Applicability. The provisions of this section govern the procedure
that must be followed in any case where it appears that a defendant who
stands convicted of a felony offense for a sexual assault upon a child
as defined in section 70.07 of the penal law has previously been
convicted of a predicate felony for a sexual assault upon a child.
2. Statement to be filed. When information available to the people
prior to the trial of a felony offense for a sexual assault upon a child
indicates that the defendant may have previously been subjected to a
predicate felony conviction for such a sexual assault, a statement may
be filed by the prosecutor at any time before trial commences setting
forth the date and place of each alleged predicate felony conviction for
a sexual assault upon a child.
3. Preliminary examination. The defendant must be given a copy of such
statement and the court must ask him whether he wishes to controvert any
allegation made therein. If the defendant wishes to controvert any alle-
gation in the statement, he must specify the particular allegation or
allegations he wishes to controvert. Uncontroverted allegations in the
statement shall be deemed to have been admitted by the defendant.
4. Cases where further hearing is not required. Where the uncontro-
verted allegations in the statement are sufficient to support a finding
that the defendant has been subjected to a predicate felony conviction
for a sexual assault upon a child the court must enter such finding and
when imposing sentence must sentence the defendant in accordance with
the provisions of section 70.07 of the penal law.
5. Cases where further hearing is required. Where the defendant
controverts an allegation in the statement, the court must proceed to
hold a hearing.
6. Manner of conducting hearing. (a) A hearing pursuant to this
section must be before the court without jury. The burden of proof is
upon the people and a finding that the defendant has been subjected to a
predicate felony conviction for a sexual assault upon a child must be
based upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt by evidence admissible under
the rules applicable to a trial of the issue of guilt.
(b) Regardless of whether the age of the victim is an element of the
alleged predicate felony offense, where the defendant controverts an
allegation that the victim of an alleged sexual assault upon a child was
less than fifteen years old, the people may prove that the child was
less than fifteen years old by any evidence admissible under the rules
applicable to a trial of the issue of guilt. For purposes of determining
whether a child was less than fifteen years old, the people shall not be
required to prove that the defendant knew the child was less than
fifteen years old at the time of the alleged sexual assault.
(c) A previous conviction in this or any other jurisdiction which was
obtained in violation of the rights of the defendant under the applica-
ble provisions of the constitution of the united states must not be
counted in determining whether the defendant has been subjected to a
predicate felony conviction for a sexual assault upon a child. The
defendant may, at any time during the course of the hearing hereunder,
controvert an allegation with respect to such conviction in the state-
ment on the grounds that the conviction was unconstitutionally obtained.
Failure to challenge the previous conviction in the manner provided
herein constitutes a waiver on the part of the defendant of any allega-
tion of unconstitutionality unless good cause be shown for such failure
to make timely challenge.
(d) At the conclusion of the hearing the court must make a finding as
to whether or not the defendant has been subjected to a predicate felony
conviction for a sexual assault upon a child.
7. Subsequent use of predicate felony conviction finding. Where a
finding has been entered pursuant to this section, such finding shall be
binding in any future proceeding in which the issue may arise.